As recently as the 2025 college football offseason, the NCAA had two permitted transfer portal windows: one in the winter at the conclusion of the previous season and one after spring ball. But this year, college football’s governing body condensed the calendar, now requiring players who wish to transfer to officially enter their names in the transfer portal from January 2 to January 16. 

While the NCAA’s new single transfer portal window for college football was seen as a good measure to decrease constant roster turnover and players angling for bigger paydays twice per year, the new-look calendar didn’t come without its fair share of complaints.

Clemson coach Dabo Swinney went on an epic tirade, accusing Ole Miss coach Pete Golding of tampering with transfer portal signee Luke Ferrelli. Swinney alleged Golding sent Ferrelli a photo of a “$1 million contract” and inquired about his buyout from Clemson. After originally committing to Clemson, Ferrelli later re-entered the transfer portal and committed to Ole Miss.

Before the Ferrelli saga, Golding complained about new LSU coach Lane Kiffin attempting to lure away Ole Miss players during the College Football Playoff. Numerous former Ole Miss players later followed Kiffin to Baton Rouge.

Despite the new rules and public NIL contracts, college football feels more unchecked than ever. No player feels untouchable. Contracts are rarely legally binding. Eligibility has never felt more confusing. And “tampering” feels a bit like speeding on the interstate, where if everyone is doing it, it’s difficult to enforce.

In the weeks that followed the closure of the “one-true transfer portal window”, whispers have started to grow louder about the legitimacy and likelihood of ‘shadow transfers’ emerging post-spring ball. 

The NCAA has done its best to limit player movement to one transfer portal window. But what might come next could test the sport’s governing body to its outer limits. Because in a world where recruiting takes place in DMs and via money-hungry agents, a calendar date might be just a suggestion.

Welcome to the era of the Shadow Transfer, where the most important players on your roster could be plotting a move elsewhere, whether the NCAA likes it or not.

A “shadow transfer” is a player who finishes spring practice with one team, while plotting a post-spring ball move elsewhere despite there not being a legal spring transfer window. 

Unlike some more traditional transfers, the player in this scenario already knows his next destination, with a deal being done via back-channels during spring practice. And unlike a traditional transfer move, the player wouldn’t enter the transfer portal – instead opting to circumvent the one-window rule by simply enrolling at his new school. 

If this type of maneuver sounds vaguely familiar, it’s because former Wisconsin-turned-Miami DB Xavier Lucas did it first in January 2025. Lucas, then a member of the Badgers football program, left for Coral Gables after the winter transfer portal window had closed. He attempted to circumvent the rules by withdrawing from classes at Wisconsin (despite already signing an NIL contract) and enrolling at Miami in January 2025. He went on to play a full season for the 2025 Miami Hurricanes, tallying 45 tackles, eight passes deflected, and one interception.

It was a first-of-its-kind move, and now many within the sport are wondering whether other players will try it, too. 

The controversial move resulted in a lawsuit. The whole thing was confusing, unsurprising, and prompted numerous questions about the enforceability of the NCAA’s transfer portal window rules.

The fallout from Lucas’ move prompted the NCAA Division I Football Subdivision Oversight Committee to issue three recommendations to the Division I Cabinet to prevent similar shenanigans.

According to Robby Kalland of CBS Sports, if the measure is approved, once an enrolled student-athlete who was not active in the transfer portal at the time of the transfer participates in any athletically related activity at the next school, the following actions would occur: 

If that sounds extremely harsh, well, it is. The NCAA is putting its foot down in hopes of stomping out this potential loophole. 

But if Lucas could semi-successfully do it… why can’t others? 

The NCAA thought that by eliminating the spring transfer portal window, it had alleviated the pressure of the college football calendar. But unintended consequences are still consequences. 

College football has always been a game played under floodlights with decisions made in the shadows. Backroom dealings will never not be part of the fabric of the game we love.

With this move, the NCAA attempted to bring governance to an ungovernable sport. The whole thing reminds me of a famous quote from HBO’s hit series The Wire. We see 105-man roster caps and stricter transfer rules and think, “The game done changed.” But as Slim Charles once famously remarked, “The game’s the same, just got more fierce.” 

The emergence of shadow transfers won’t just expose more of the sport’s seedy underbelly. It might be the fiercest challenge yet to what little power the NCAA has left.

Since the very beginning, we’ve been built around the idea of bringing college football fans together. By joining us on Patreon, you’re helping us keep that mission alive—supporting the show while becoming part of a community that lives and breathes the sport every day.

As a member, you’ll unlock exclusive perks built for the most loyal fans:

👉 Ad-Free Episodes
Every show, no ads

👉 Bonus Shows
Exclusive content

👉 Early Access
Listen before everyone else

👉 Discord Community
CFB talk, 24/7

It's time for our annual college football business update, and we couldn't think of anyone better than our friend Matt Brown from Extra Points (ExtraPointsMB.com) to walk us through everything happening behind the scenes. From the revenue arms race to jersey patches to the SCORE Act, Matt breaks down the big-picture forces shaping every athletic department in the country. We talk about whether spending more money is actually worth it, what Congress can realistically do about college sports reform, which revenue streams matter more than fans think, and why the stadium experience still has a long way to go. Plus, a seedy video game pitch, a ringing endorsement for Milwaukee, and Dan discovers Summerfest 2026.

▶️ Listen on Apple Podcasts

▶️ Listen on Spotify

▶️ Watch on YouTube